Posts Tagged review

Birder’s Diary 3.6 Review



Birder's Diary Main Screen

Let me begin this review with a warning. Do not judge a book by its cover. I am all too guilty of committing this cardinal sin, especially when it comes to anything to do with computers. When it comes to birding software though, I beg of you – don’t. Few birding programs look great and the horrible reality is, functionality often increases as the appearance worsens.

Jones Technologies’ Birder’s Diary is a case in point. It would be a forgivable error to open the trial of this program, click around for two minutes, then head straight for the control panel to remove it. It is ugly and its best features are buried in an ocean of awkward presentation. The interface feels like it belongs in Windows 95. Don’t be fooled however, the grittiness grows on you and you will get a sense of accomplishment just from learning your way around.

With that warning out of the way, here is the long overdue review!

Purchase and Trial

The Birder’s Diary trial is fully functional with all taxonomic lists available. Birder’s Diary has standard tiered purchasing model, common to nearly all birding and wildlife database programs.

First, it offers a basic or advanced user license, the basic offering reduced functionality. The price gap is quite large with the basic at $34USD and the advanced at $79USD. This is significant as the basic licence misses some huge features like user-defined sightings fields and the ability to edit taxonomies.

Second, a taxonomic license must be purchased. There is a huge range of licenses, including many for North American and British plants and animals. Unfortunately, for Australians, the only options are for birds. The taxonomic list used is the up to date Christidis and Boles (2008). It would be nice to see the range available expanded but as there is currently no active program that offers anything other than birds, it’s difficult to fault Birder’s Diary on this. I will include a full explanation of pricing in the conclusion.

The Program

Installation and setting up

I had no problems at all downloading and installing Birder’s Diary on my Windows XP machine. No hiccups, no confusing questions, nothing. A straightforward download and installation. As I mentioned in the introduction however, after opening the program, setting up was not something I looked forward to. There is more junk than usual floating around this program. I use the term ‘junk’ tentatively however, as I am sure there are those that find the poorly rendered computer-voiced talking parrot endearing and the ‘tip of the day’ splash screen charming. I do not. Thankfully both of these features are easy enough to turn off.

‘Petey’ the talking parrot unfortunately plays a critical role in the program. If you wish to get a quick run down of how any window works, the only way you can do it from within the program is to get a an irritating, slow, and grating lecture from this annoying psittacine. If you make the mistake of starting him off, hold on for the ride because there is no stopping him once you get him started (seriously). Unless you are a masochist, do not get him to run through the whole ‘basics’ tutorial. Petey also plays a critical role in the speech recognition feature of this program. I personally deplore speech recognition and I especially despise Petey, so the effectiveness of this feature is not covered in this review.

Thankfully, there is a better way to learn about Birder’s Diary. I have encountered few programs with as thorough a user guide or as helpful support than Birder’s Diary. From the quick start guide which will get you immediately more comfortable with the user interface, to the video tutorials, actual demonstrations of how to use the software, Birder’s Diary is the best I have seen. If you have any problems, which are likely to come if you don’t read the guide, you can go to the dedicated support forums on the product website. If you don’t like this model, message Jeff, the developer, directly. A nice guy who is happy to answer questions. This is customer service.

Entering a new sighting


Adding a sighting


Birder’s Diary offers two entry methods for inputting data into its database. The first is the Keyboard entry mode where each sighting is entered manually. As horrible as this sounds for those with thousands of sightings tucked away in journals, entering data into Birder’s Diary in this way, if you are a decent typist, is actually incredibly speedy. You can tab through the fields at speed, there are different keyboard shortcuts to do anything you would need and there is an alert sound once an entry is completed this. I trialled this entry method and found myself eventually being able to enter ten or so records before I even had to look at the screen!

The second entry method, the one that Bluebird Technologies’ Bird Journal so desperately needs, is the checklist entry method. You select ‘Checklist Entry’, select your taxonomic list, type in your location and it will generate a checklist of all the species found in that area. All species already sighted in the said area are highlighted. Well, at least that’s how it works if you live in North America. For Australian users, there is no native data for where different species occur so the only way a checklist can be generated is from sightings you have already entered through the keyboard entry method.

All the data fields are user customisable so you can enter whatever information you please. Well, at least under the ‘advanced’ license anyway. There are ‘min max’ count fields and the count defaults to one if you leave it empty. Birder’s Diary also has the ability to group sightings in to trips, a nice feature lacking from some other programs. Surprisingly, where Birder’s Diary irritated me was the ‘SmartSearch’ fields. These are a common feature and Birder’s Diary took them one step further with ability to search for the scientific or common name, something I long for with Bird Journal. Where it gets it wrong however is that if I mistype something, it’s not possible to simply backspace and start again. Each time I made a mistake I had to reset all the fields in the sighting window with a button on the right side. It is a small idiosyncrasy, but an annoying one nonetheless.

Finally, as I mentioned in the Bird Journal review, the ability to modify the date format is desperately needed. We do not all live in the USA. If I had to pick one thing that slows down data entry more than anything else, it is this.

Reviewing entries and generating reports

Please note, I am fighting off goosebumps as I write this. I like reports; I am a report man. Generating a report in Birder’s Diary takes some understanding and patience, but once I picked it up, I was very impressed. Everything in the report is customisable. I can choose what data to output, how many columns per page I want, what font I want it in, even what taxonomy I want it generated in. This last option may sound pointless but believe you me, it’s not. Being in Australia, nearly all my sightings are recorded using the taxonomy endorsed by Birds Australia (RAOU). So, if I were to give my life list to an American or British birder, there would be discrepancies as to what counts as a tick and what doesn’t. Birder’s Diary remedies this problem with the ‘things’ concept.

‘Things’ may confuse a user new to Birder’s Diary so here is a quick run-down. Each living creature or plant is treated as a ‘thing’ by this program. Taxonomies then use these ‘things’ and categorise them and assign them as they see fit. One taxonomy can classify a thing as a subspecies and another classify it a full species, regardless the properties of the underlying ‘thing’ do not change. By doing this, it is easy to generate new lists and reports using different taxonomies from the same original entered data. Pretty clever, huh? I thought so too.

Birder’s Diary goes even further with ‘things’ by giving you the ability to view their associations through the ‘Rosetta Stone’ section.


Rosetta Stone


Arguably the neatest feature insofar as report generation goes, is the number of formats you can output to. Whether you just want to print the report, email it, or get it in HTML, PDF or RTF, Birder’s Diary has got your back. I feel empowered just writing about it.

Treatment of Taxonomies

There is little lacking from Birder’s Diary in this department. There is a full blown taxonomy editor, a taxonomy viewer and even a ‘thing’ editor. You can create your own taxonomic lists, although the process is multi-stepped and time consuming due to the programs use of ‘things’ as a base for taxonomies. However, I reiterate that ‘things’ are a net positive.

In addition to the ability to edit or create taxonomies as you see fit, Birder’s Diary also has the common names in a number of different dialects and languages. These can be assigned to any taxonomy you wish, although they are only available in Spanish, French, German, generic ‘American’ and ‘European. A useful feature for some nonetheless.

Import/Export Functionality

While I have not tested the import/export functionality of Birder’s Diary, it appears to offer a decent selection of import options. It is possible to import directly from AviSys 4 and 5 in addition to CSV (comma separate values) files. Most other birding programs support export to CSV and even the format is wrong, it would not be a monumental effort to clean it up in a spreadsheet and re-export it to CSV.

Thumbs up from me, although I think many new users would be thankful for straight out direct import functionality from other birding programs. There really aren’t that many out there so it wouldn’t be too difficult. While there is no option to export to eBird in Birder’s Diary, but there is a toolkit to enable user to do just that available for download from the website. I have not tested it as I don’t use eBird, but there you have it.

Missing Features

For an out and out birding program, there is not much missing from Birder’s Diary. If the developers wanted to take it in a different direction, the ability to handle media, whether sound recordings, video or photos, would transform this into something really special. A more useful reference list would be useful too, Ibis Publishing is hardly an ‘important birding site’. Links to major ornithological organisations would be far more useful. Even a Wikipedia search box that automatically opens a new browser window would be helpful. Wikipedia use is controversial but it is better than nothing.

Conclusion

Birder’s Diary is not going to win any beauty contests. Opening it to enter sightings conjures memories of opening Matlab for the first time, you know it’s good, but you wonder if it’s worth diving into the hornet’s nest at all. I am here to tell you that it is! If you plan on downloading the trial to give Birder’s Diary a go, be sure to check out the quick start guide, it’s worth the effort to read.

I have thoroughly enjoyed learning my way around Birder’s Diary. This truly is an incredible program that will transform how you bird. Unfortunately, the program is largely geared towards North American and British users, but with a little patience and tinkering, it is definitely malleable enough to be useful for Australian birders. It is wonderful to have a piece of proprietary software as customisable as this one.

While the SmartSearch fields leave much to be desired, inputting sightings through both the keyboard and checklist methods is a breeze. I am still drooling over the reports generation functionality and it is clear that the developers have put much effort into developing this aspect of the program. The taxonomy viewer and editor are top-notch, as is the Rosetta Stone feature. I can see myself entering this program to use this feature alone. The ability to import AviSys data and CSV files should make the transition smooth for users of other software. Even eBird users can now easily export Birder’s Diary data using a downloadable toolkit found on the Birder’s Diary website.

Probably the only major let down of Birder’s Diary is the price. It is considerably expensive and not an investment to be undertaken lightly. Assuming you want the taxonomy editor, taxonomy viewer and Rosetta Stone, you will be looking at USD$79 for the ‘Advanced User License’, not including any taxonomies. The price of taxonomic lists vary, but here are the lists I would imagine are the most popular:

World list (Clements and Cornell Lab of Ornithology) – $99
North America (ABA/Clements w/ subspecies) – $69
Australia (RAOU) – $49

As I said, not cheap. There is also and option for you to desktop share and have the program completely installed for you for a one off price of USD$49. All major upgrades to the software also incur additional charges, around USD$49 if you are upgrading from the last major version. There go your savings.

All in all, pricing aside, I would highly recommend Birder’s Diary for the serious birder as it will definitely fulfill any need a birder is likely to have for a birding program. The major competition for this industry leading software is AviSys, but unfortunately the developers have not returned my requests for a test copy of the product. From the descriptions and screen shots however, it does not look like it us up to the standard in any case.

Hope you enjoyed the review!

*Please note, the developer has responded to this review with some corrections. Be sure to check it out!

Tags: , , , ,

Bird Journal 1.4 – Developer Response

When I published the Bird Journal review a couple of days ago, I shot off an email to Bluebird Technology to see if they wanted to respond to anything. Not surprisingly I got an email back less than 48 hours later (customer service really is their strong point).

…I’d say it is a fair assessment of where we are at right now.

Regarding the Gallery – it will not slow down with lots of photos. We’ve designed it in such a way that it only loads what is on screen.

We’ll certainly take all suggestions on board. In fact a number of your concerns are already being addressed in version 2. Version 2′s headline features are: Checklists, Other Wildlife and Import. You’ll be able to enter from, view and share checklists. Import is planned to support a number of major formats, to allow easy migration of data to Bird Journal.

Some of your other suggestions may also make a guest appearance in version 2, time permitting. Photo’s to be ‘tagged’ with more than a single bird has been suggested before, and the date format and min-max counts should be easy things to tweak…



Not much more you can expect from a developer is there? A quick reminder though that major version upgrades cost money. If your enjoyment of this program is dependent on any of the new features, it will probably pay to hold off as opposed to purchasing now and receiving a “discount” later.

Justin will be showing me an advanced copy of version two when it is ready, so I will be sure to let you all know who it fairs, particularly its import functionality.

Tags: , , ,

Bird Journal 1.4 – A Review

Having a look around the net for a decent review of any kind of birding software proved completely fruitless for me. I noticed a fair few people were having the same problem. Seeing as I really wanted a good piece of software to use for birding, I thought I would just grab a few different titles that were available and try them out for myself. The best looking, cheapest and therefore most attractive software I could find was Bird Journal, so here is my review of it.

Note: I am not a professional ornithologist or even a jet setting world traveling amateur. I am an average Joe that really likes birds. Birding, in one way or another, is something that I do every single day. Please let me know if there is anything else you would like to know about.

Purchase and Trial

One of the great things to come out of the growth in popularity and use of the internet has been the birth of the ‘trial version’. Today, this is an expected must have for any software developer wanting to market their product. Gone are the days when a developer can make a pretty box, run a few ads and watch the customers line up. For whatever reason, this has escaped the major producers of birding software. Thankfully, Bluebird Technology have taken the opportunity to try before you buy to the next level. Offered on the website is a fully-functional trial version that anyone can download without any kind of registration. The trial comes with sample database to let you explore the programs feature set without having to enter your data. Of course, if you wish to enter your data, that option is also open to you, albeit limited to 15 entries.

Once you have sampled enough and decided you like the program, the purchase process is straightforward. The program comes in three versions although this just relates to taxonomic licensing. The version I have is the local edition with the up to date 2008 Christidis and Boles taxonomy. Bluebird go on to offer a 60 day money back guarantee if you are not satisfied with the product for any reason. You can’t really beat that from a customer service perspective!

The Program

Installation and setting up

From download to first entry, this program was a breeze. It comes with a PDF user guide but I doubt you will find a need for it. The way the program is laid out, you will be able to figure it out just by poking around the interface. There are no strange nuances or unnecessary features like the talking parrot with speech recognition in Birder’s Diary, it is straightforward and is all about getting the job done.

I had no installation problems whatsoever and that program did not crash on me once. I haven’t got any strange error messages and even the uninstall (I reinstalled it to test) was smooth and without hiccup.

Entering a new sighting


Screenshot 1


The entry method is fairly stock standard, although it will require a little extra work in the long run (no checklist entry). The entry is split into two section, the “entry” and the “sightings”. The default data collected for the “entry” section is:

- Date
- Start and end time of sighting
- Location
- General photos
- Weather
- Notes
- Ebird required fields

This data is all customisable so any of these entry fields (apart from date and time) can be added or removed. The default data collected for the “sighting” section is:

- Species
- Count
- Sighting photos
- Notes
- Properties (“Heard only”, “Interesting” and “Good view”)

Of course, all of this information is also customisable. I added with ease extra fields for sexes, plumage information and maturity.

The species field is particularly well designed with an auto search function that form fills in a way similar to what you might see on an internet browser. It is a much friendlier auto search function than what I saw in Birder’s Diary. Unfortunately, like Birder’s Diary, you are limited to searches by common name. Not too big a hassle really, but I can’t understand why the ability to search this way isn’t offered for those of us that prefer using scientific names as opposed to common ones when we can.

Overall all the data you would want collected is there (and what isn’t you can add) but there are a few things missing. When entering a new sighting, the only method of entry is to manually enter every bird you saw that day. It would be an easy fix to include a checklist entry method like that seen in other birding software. I don’t really fancy writing Common Myna, Willie Wagtail and Magpie-lark in every single entry I make for the rest of my life. I don’t like the absence of the “min max” count either. There is the option to remove the count altogether from your sightings, but I do like the “min count – max count” option. It would also be nice if the data entered into custom fields transferred to the filter options when later looking at entries. If this were the case, it would be easy to group entries into specific trips or periods without the need for Bluebird to recode the software.

Finally, and this is a surprisingly big issue, Bird Journal desperately needs an option to change the date format. As much as I enjoy the American Month/Day/Year system, I don’t think my computer keyboard can take much more fist slamming. I’m just kidding of course, but it is shocking how annoying something as little as this can get.

Photos

This is fairly unique feature so really, any functionality is a plus. Just the same, I am particularly fond of the way that this program uses the photos you input into sightings. Rather than maintaining an index of the inputted file’s location on the computer and then linking to them, it actually copies the files, shrinks them and keeps them in a separate database. This prevents problems every time you move a photo on your computer. The only real let down is that the Bird Journal does not use a tagging system for the photos, so you are limited to associating only one species with each photo. Pretty much rules out group photos unless you want dupes. The ultimate feature would be a Facebook like tagging system where tags could be associated with specific sections of the photo, although I may be reaching on that one!

The gallery system works well although eventually I could see it becoming quite slow to load. The default filtering on the gallery screen is to show *all* photos, fine to start with, not good after 5 years. I can envisage waiting ten minutes for the gallery to load before being able to filter out what I don’t want to look at. Easy fix though, hopefully future versions will load the gallery empty and then allow you to initiate the actual loading of images after filtering.

Reviewing entries and generating reports

Unfortunately, this is where Bird Journal falls a bit behind its competitors. It is simply not possible to generate reports to the standard that is achieved in Birder’s Diary or other software. There is little control in how your report is presented. If I want to get a list of birds seen on the Cairns Esplanade in May 2009, it will generate a list of common names with when the species was first sighted and last sighted. Nice list, but too bad if I want to see scientific names, dates sighted that month, number of observers or comments.


Screenshot 2


Hopefully this will mature in future versions.

One the plus side however, if I was to want a report for a specific entry, the reports look seriously snazzy, with all the information entered (including photos) included in it. Again though, not customisable whatsoever.


Screenshot 3


Graphs

The graphs are a nice touch and they really add to the professional feel of the application. To really get all you can from them though, it is important that you keep very accurate species counts of everywhere you visit. It is also important to take the counts consistently every time you visit a location, something I don’t currently do. Inaccurate or partial counts will produce disappointing charts which slap you in the face with the holes in your data.

“So, why is there a complete absence of House Sparrows in Cairns starting one month after you bought Bird Journal?”

Missing features

While I have found Bird Journal a very worthwhile piece of software, there are some things which would really give an edge on the competition. Some others were mentioned during the review which I will not mention here.

Taxonomy Editor

This is an absolute must. As much as I trust that Bluebird Technology is immortal and will be with us forever, I don’t really want to be left out in the cold if this company goes bust or stops developing Bird Journal. If Bird Journal is to stand the test of time, this feature simply must be added.

Taxonomy Viewer

Understandable that Bird Journal is targeted at the amateur birdwatcher, but the absence of a taxonomy viewer is inexcusable. This would surely be a relatively simple thing to include and it is truly invaluable learning resource.

Import/export functionality

Here is where Bird Journal is completely impotent. If you are currently using AviSys, Birder’s Diary, Wildlife Lister — heck, if you are using a spreadsheet, forget about importing it into Bird Journal. The ability to import data, even from its own backup databases, is nil.
Similarly, there are simply no satisfactory options for exporting data. You can export to ebird, but the csv export functionality is poor. While I can easily export a page of data from Bird Journal and import it accurately into a spreadsheet, trying to export a whole range was a complete failure for me. This particular aspect was really disappointing as import/export functionality can really make or break a database application. I mean really, that is the point of a database application is it not? Otherwise it is about as useful as a paper notebook insofar as what you can do with the data.

Conclusion

Bird Journal, at $58AUD for the local edition, is currently the cheapest decent option as far as birding software goes. It lacks several of what I consider to be crucial features, but ultimately it is a good piece of software for the money. It’s pretty, it does the job, the email support is brilliant and it comes with a money back guarantee. The best option is to try it for yourself, but I don’t think many of you will be disappointed with it. From the sounds things, it is very much in active development and the future looks bright. I think provided the developers don’t get distracted with other projects, this will truly become a wonderful solution for birders, amateur to professional.

This is the first review I have done so perhaps I will update it once I finish poking through Birder’s Diary and I get a proper look at Avisys. Let me know if you even care!

Tags: , , , , ,

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes